commit 1227933a8e47ded5615565a99b9a08e02b9fea09
Author: Bùi Thành Nhân <hi@imnhan.com>
Date:   Sun Oct 3 13:29:38 2021 +0700

    clearer point, typography fluff

diff --git a/content/posts/i-made-my-python-webapp-pip-installable.md b/content/posts/i-made-my-python-webapp-pip-installable.md
index 6e061be..675d5d7 100644
--- a/content/posts/i-made-my-python-webapp-pip-installable.md
+++ b/content/posts/i-made-my-python-webapp-pip-installable.md
@@ -101,15 +101,20 @@ ## But why bother?
 another layer of firewall that locks down every port by default that you can
 setup on their totally usable web console or infrastructure-as-code it in your
 cloudformations or your terraformses or, actually, do you have a moment to talk
-about our lord and savior Cthulhubernetes-
+about our lord and savior Cthulhubernetes--
 
 But I digress.
 
 I guess what I was trying to say is, throwing abstractions over complex
 procedures is simply shifting the costs elsewhere. Shipping your software in a
-Dockerfile is file, but making your distribution so simple that people can
+Dockerfile is fine, but making your distribution so simple that people can
 easily write a couple of lines of Dockerfile for it by themselves is more
-valuable.
+valuable. Simple distribution is simple to deploy regardless of whether you're
+using docker, packer, ansible, pyinfra, podman, nomad, k8s, k3s, an
+impenetrable shell script some dude wrote 2 years ago who just left the company
+last month... or any combination of the above. The point is **you shouldn't be
+forced to use more heavyweight solutions just because the software is a pain in
+the butt to setup manually**.
 
 And other people _have_ been trying to make python application distribution
 simpler: